PET Bottles

PET Cup Factory China Manufacturer - High-Quality Plastic Cups

I represent a PET Cup Factory in China, a dependable Manufacturer delivering high-quality disposable cups to clients worldwide. We offer FDA-grade, food-contact PET cups in multiple sizes, from translucent standard cups to printed designs for branding. Our production lines use advanced extrusion-stretch blow molding and automated quality checks to ensure consistent thickness and leak-proof performance. I can customize shapes, colors, and printing (up to several colors) to match your packaging. Lead times are competitive, with flexible MOQs for new projects and scalable capacity for bulk orders. We maintain strict QA, on-time shipments, and transparent pricing. By partnering with us you get reliable supply from a China-based Manufacturer that understands the needs of importers, distributors, and F&B brands. If you need eco-friendly options, we can discuss recyclable PET grades and lightweight designs. Let's connect to align on specs, certification, and delivery schedules.

Hot Selling Product

PET Cup Factory Manufacturer Ahead of the Curve

A PET cup factory positioned ahead of the curve combines advanced production technology with strict quality systems to meet the needs of global buyers. High-speed thermoforming and precision tooling deliver consistent dimensions and clarity across a wide range of cup sizes, lids and printing options, while automated inspection and traceable batch control ensure compliance with food-contact regulations. Flexible capacity and responsive lead times support both small custom runs and large-scale programs, reducing time-to-market for seasonal promotions or long-term supply agreements. Sustainability and cost-efficiency are built into product design and supply-chain services: lightweighting, mono-material constructions for easier recycling, and options for recycled-content PET lower environmental impact without sacrificing performance. Value-added services such as custom branding, barrier coatings, sample prototyping and consolidated international logistics make purchasing simpler for overseas procurement teams. For buyers seeking a reliable, future-focused PET cup partner, these capabilities translate into predictable quality, competitive pricing and scalable delivery.

{ PET Cup Factory Manufacturer Ahead of the Curve}
Category Parameter Typical Value / Range Units Test Standard / Note
Material Properties Resin Description Semi-crystalline thermoplastic polyester (PET) Common feedstock for rigid clear cups and thermoformed products
Material Properties Intrinsic Viscosity (IV) 0.60 – 1.10 (typical cup grades 0.65–0.95) dL/g Measured by viscometry (ASTM D4603); affects melt strength and mechanical properties
Material Properties Density ~1.36 – 1.39 g/cm³ Measured per ASTM D792; typical solid PET density
Thermal Glass Transition (Tg) ~70 – 80 °C DSC (ASTM D3418); influences service temperature and thermoforming window
Thermal Melting Temperature (Tm) ~250 – 260 °C DSC; relevant for melt processing (extrusion, injection)
Mechanical Tensile Strength (yield) ≈50 – 75 MPa Per ASTM D638; depends on orientation and IV
Mechanical Young's Modulus ~2.5 – 3.5 GPa Stiffness for molded/thin-wall parts; ASTM D638
Barrier Oxygen Transmission Rate (OTR) Highly thickness-dependent; typical 5 – 40 cc·m⁻²·day⁻¹ (approx.) Measured per ASTM/FDA methods; barrier improves with wall thickness and orientation
Barrier Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR) ~1 – 8 (depends on gauge) g·m⁻²·day⁻¹ Measured per ASTM E96; orientation and additives affect WVTR
Processing Extrusion / Melt Temp ~250 – 290 °C Typical processing window for sheet/pellet extrusion and injection; depends on equipment
Processing Thermoforming (sheet) Heating Range ~140 – 180 (surface temp) °C Oven zones tuned by gauge; overheat causes crystallization and poor clarity
Processing Typical Wall Thickness (cups) ≈80 – 350 µm (0.08–0.35 mm) Depends on intended use (cold drink cups typically thinner; hot cups thicker or multi-layer)
Processing Cycle Time (thermoforming) ~2 – 8 seconds per piece Varies with size, tooling, and automation level
Additives Common Additives Nucleating agents, clarifiers, UV stabilizers, slip agents wt% (typically <1–3%) Small loadings adjust crystallization, clarity, and processing; selection affects recyclability
Sustainability & Compliance Recycling Code 1 Widely accepted in curbside and commercial recycling streams (mechanical and chemical recycling routes)
Sustainability & Compliance Typical Recycled Content in Cups Commonly 20% – 50% rPET (application dependent) % Higher rPET may affect clarity and melt properties; quality-controlled rPET recommended for food contact
Sustainability & Compliance Cradle-to-Gate GHG (approx.) Virgin PET: ~2.0–3.5 ; rPET: ~0.8–1.8 kg CO₂e / kg polymer Values vary with feedstock, energy mix, and recycling route (literature LCA ranges)
Regulatory Food Contact Approvals Compliant grades available Typical compliance references include FDA food-contact criteria (e.g., 21 CFR) and EU food-contact measures (e.g., Regulation (EU) No 10/2011) for approved formulations
Product Specs Common Cup Volumes 80, 120, 180, 250, 350, 500 mL Standard consumer sizes for hot/cold beverage and food sampling cups
Handling & Use Service Temperature Safe for cold to warm use; avoid prolonged exposure >70°C Not suitable for conventional microwave cooking; hot filling must account for dimensional stability and potential crystallization

Related Products

PET Cups

PET Cup Factory Supplier Application

Supplier Evaluation Scores by Key Performance Dimensions

The bar chart above summarizes the evaluation scores for five supplier applicants across five key performance dimensions: Quality, Lead Time, Cost Efficiency, Sustainability, and Production Capacity. Each applicant is represented along the horizontal axis, and each colored bar group indicates their relative scores (0-100 scale) for each dimension. These dimensions were selected to provide a balanced view of operational performance (Quality, Capacity), commercial competitiveness (Cost Efficiency, Lead Time), and strategic alignment with environmental goals (Sustainability). Applicant C shows the strongest Quality and Capacity scores, suggesting reliable product consistency and production throughput, but a longer lead time which may affect responsiveness. Applicant E demonstrates a solid overall balance with particularly high Sustainability and Capacity ratings, indicating both environmental practices and production capability. Applicant B performs well on Lead Time with competitive turnaround, and shows decent scores across other areas, making it a well-rounded candidate for time-sensitive orders. Applicant A offers high Quality and Capacity but lags in Sustainability and Cost Efficiency, which may influence long-term partnership decisions. Applicant D has competitive Cost Efficiency and Lead Time but lower Sustainability and overall Quality, which could be appropriate for budget-focused or less critical product lines.

When using this chart in a supplier selection process, stakeholders should weight each dimension according to project priorities. For example, prioritize Quality and Capacity for high-volume, specialized products, or emphasize Lead Time and Cost Efficiency for time-sensitive, cost-critical runs. Sustainability weighting may be increased for brands with environmental commitments. Combined scores or weighted indices can be derived from the raw values shown to produce a single comparative metric for ranking applicants and making final sourcing decisions.

Top Selling Products

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

For inquiries about our products or pricelist, please leave your email to us and we will be in touch within 24 hours.

Follow Us

on our social media
  • whatsapp (1)
  • instagram
  • youtube